FECIF Editorial
our policy-focused commentary written monthly by FECIF board members and industry experts, offering expert perspectives on regulatory developments, industry challenges, and opportunities that affect financial intermediaries across Europe.
“We must urgently address the excessive bureaucracy that burdens advisors and, in doing so, harms consumers. Balanced regulation is the best form of consumer protection.”
Michael Herzhofer
AFPA Chairman
Editorial | September 2025
Senior consumers and their access to insurance and financial services
As our society ages, we face a defining challenge: ensuring that the systems we build are inclusive and supportive for all citizens, especially those who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's prosperity. In Austria, the demographic shift is undeniable. By 2035, more than a quarter of our population will be over the age of 65. As the association representing Austria's independent financial and insurance professionals, AFPA felt a profound responsibility to move beyond assumptions and gather concrete facts about the financial well-being of our seniors.
To that end, we commissioned a comprehensive, nationwide study to understand the realities that Austrians aged 55 and over face when accessing insurance and financial services. The results are not just illuminating; they are a stark call to action for our entire industry and for our nation's policymakers. The message is clear: we are failing to adequately serve a growing and vital part of our population, and we must act now to correct our course.
Our research uncovers a significant and troubling "protection gap." While Austrians are diligent about insuring their property—with over 91% holding household insurance—there is a dramatic shortfall in personal coverage. These are the very policies that provide peace of mind in later life. Consider the numbers:
Only 3.4% of respondents have long-term care insurance.
Just 32% have private health insurance.
A mere 23% have secured funeral insurance.
This is not due to a lack of foresight on the part of our seniors. On the contrary, our study revealed a high level of interest in acquiring these exact forms of coverage. The gap exists because of a market that is perceived as inaccessible and unwelcoming. An overwhelming 74.4% of seniors agreed that the insurance offers available to them are either unsuitable or simply too expensive.
Even more concerning is the pervasive feeling of discrimination. A staggering 70.6%—more than two-thirds of those surveyed—believe that insurance companies discriminate against them purely because of their advanced age. This is an unacceptable situation. Age should be a marker of experience, not a barrier to financial security.
The challenges extend deeply into the realm of financing. As life circumstances change, the need for credit does not simply vanish at retirement. Our study shows that the primary driver for seeking loans in later life is real estate—renovating a home to make it age-appropriate, or purchasing a more suitable property. Yet, here too, seniors face immense hurdles.
The perception of bias is even more pronounced than in the insurance sector. A remarkable 84.2% of respondents report feeling specifically disadvantaged in credit granting due to their age. They are told they are "too old" for a loan, regardless of their actual creditworthiness or financial stability. This practice not only denies individuals the ability to adapt their living situations but also stifles economic activity and personal autonomy.
In the face of these systemic obstacles, our study reinforced one timeless truth: the profound value of trusted, personal advice. In an era of aggressive digitalization, our seniors are sending a clear message. 81.5% prefer to receive personal advice on financial matters rather than researching on their own. They understand the risks of navigating a complex market alone, with 76.5% fearing that they would choose an unsuitable product if they were to purchase insurance online.
This highlights the essential role of AFPA's members—the independent advisors who provide tailored, face-to-face guidance in communities across Austria. Yet, their ability to provide this vital service is being choked by a relentless increase in bureaucracy. Our analysis shows that the administrative workload required to meet regulatory demands is staggering. It takes an advisor 8 hours and 36 minutes of work to process an insurance offering and a shocking 11 hours and 18 minutes for a loan application. Much of this time is spent on back-office compliance, stealing precious hours that should be dedicated to client consultation.
Therefore, on behalf of AFPA, I issue a direct call to action:
To the Insurance and Banking Industry: It is time to innovate. We need to develop products that are genuinely designed for the senior market—products that are flexible, fairly priced, and accessible. We must move past outdated risk models that penalize age and instead assess individuals on their true financial standing.
To our Policymakers: We ask you to create a regulatory environment that fosters, rather than hinders, access to financial advice. We must urgently address the excessive bureaucracy that burdens advisors and, in doing so, harms consumers. Balanced regulation is the best form of consumer protection. And: Support private and occupational pension schemes through tax incentives and modern funding models.
To our Members: Your role has never been more critical. The trust you build with your clients is the bedrock of financial security in our communities. AFPA will continue to champion your cause and advocate fiercely for a system that allows you to do what you do best: provide invaluable advice to the people of Austria.
The findings of our study are not a condemnation, but a compass. They point the way toward a more equitable and functional financial market—one that honors our seniors with the dignity and security they have rightfully earned. Let us work together to build it.
As a broker, it is important to me to protect people against existential risks. I see myself as a companion to our clients, whom we advise comprehensively depending on their life situation and provide with the necessary products and services. Why should this no longer be possible just because a client has crossed an arbitrary age threshold? I sincerely hope that policymakers and the business community will soon rethink this!
As chairman of AFPA, I not only criticize age-based discrimination, but also want to highlight the economic dimension. The independent financial advisors and insurance intermediaries we represent aim not only to fulfill a socially important role (comprehensive advice and protection), but also to seize market opportunities. And right now, there is plenty to be done.
Our goal is to create a win-win-win situation:
Solid protection for older individuals
A solution to a societal challenge
Better market opportunities for advisors and intermediaries
This means: To ensure that consumers continue to have access to independent insurance and financial advice in the future, AFPA actively participates in shaping the regulation of the European and Austrian financial markets. A well-functioning financial and insurance market is not only the foundation for a successful future—it is ultimately the best form of consumer protection.
Finally: The problems documented in Austria exist in all member countries of FECIF, as a consequence of Europe’s demographic developments.
By Michael Herzhofer, BA MA
Chairman of AFPA and Managing Director of the Secura Group
Learn more about AFPA at AFPA’s official website.
You can find the flyer about the ecosystem study HERE in German and English
More about AFPA: Direct representation. Direct information.
Founded in 2011, AFPA is the independent industry association for self-employed insurance brokers and financial advisors in Austria. It is also a member of the European industry association FECIF, based in Brussels. This means that AFPA is not only directly involved in EU regulatory processes, but also provides its members with a lasting advantage in representation and access to information—both within the EU and in Austria.
Past Editorials
Vania Franceschelli
FECIF Chairperson
Editorial | July 2025
Let Advisers Advise: Clearing the Path to a True Savings and Investments Union
Europe's financial advisers risk getting trapped in a regulatory maze that could stifle the competitiveness we desperately need. While the Commission's simplification…
Josep Soler-Albertí
EFPA Spain’s Executive Director
Editorial | May 2025
Trump Naked, Now What?
Barely three months have passed in his second term, yet it feels like years. With a compulsive media presence and dominating headlines through often…
St John Coombes
CIFSA
Editorial | March 2025
Trump V Europe an existential threat?
The theatre of Donald Trump has caused European leaders to review their current relationships both internally and externally. Whilst the focus to date has been on Global trade and Security the impact of Trump and his GOP allies has been dramatic and direct…

David Charlet
ANACOFI President & FECIF Board Director
Editorial | June 2025
Simplification or Stagnation? The EU’s Regulatory Dilemma
All that for that result ? The European Union has finally realized that it's too cumbersome and not effective enough. It's analyzing and questioning…

Martin Klein
Vice Chairman of the FECIF Board
Editorial | April 2025
Between Intention and Reality: RIS and FIDA under Scrutiny
Those who wish to strengthen retail participation in capital markets must not build regulatory barriers to entry. Yet current developments in Brussels suggest a growing risk of precisely that. Two legislative initiatives are currently under…

Cosima F. Barone
Board Member HUB+
Founder & CEO – FINARC SA
Editorial | February 2025
Deregulation in the USA: what about Europe?
As the world awakens to a new reality, i.e., the triumphant return of Donald Trump to the White House, the deregulation process has well begun in the United States. Here's an example of the potential application of an AML rule, brought…